Saturday, August 6, 2011
Analyzing Scope Creep
Background:
A few years back we were doing construction on our house. We have a very old house and having done construction in the past knew there would be some unplanned expenses that may creep up. However, we were not prepared for what we were to do. Lynch, et al state “Sometimes changes must occur due to a change in vision, a change in the needs of the customer, even a sudden change in budget” (P. 96). Our change was clearly the result of a change in vision due to not completely planning the project out.
Our changes were a result of a change in vision. We were doing a small addition to the back of our house as well as rebuilding our back porch. We had no intention of changing the size of our porch and the addition would not require that we do so. However, as the project was progressing and the addition was built, we realized it would be nice to make the porch bigger. No problem, easy to do. However, as we look at what we want to do with the porch we realize the back door will also need to be moved. To make a long story short, our well-planned budgeted project took a very different course, both in time and money. Fortunately the contractor was able to accommodate these changes.
What specific scope creep issues occurred?
“Another common source of change is the natural tendency of the client, as well as he project team members, to try to improve the project’s output as the project progresses, a phenomenon known as scope creep” (Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, and Sutton, 2008; P. 346). This is exactly what happened – as the project was progressing we envisioned further modifications that would produce a better outcome. We also realized “now was the time to do it.” However, the issues the contractor now needed to address were the additional costs associated with 1) time, 2) materials, and 3) labor. This temporarily suspended the project while he re-designed and re-planned the project.
How did you or other stakeholders deal with those issues at the time?
Our contractor had to start the porch stage of the project over. This included the planning, designing, developing, implementation, and evaluation (what were the benefits of doing these changes now vs. later) of the project. He had to identify the impact of the changes from a time and cost perspective; evaluate the advantages and disadvantages, communicate the changes and ensure they were properly executed. He analyzed our request, determined whether or not it was appropriate and feasible to make the change, prepared written documentation of the change, updated the plans, and communicated the changes. (Portny, et al; 2008. PP. 346 & 347)
Looking back on the experience now, had you been in the position of managing the project, what could you have done to better manage these issues and control the scope of the project?
I’m not really sure there are many things I could have done differently to better manage the issues and control the scope of the project. As previously stated, scope creep happens when you see a way to produce a better outcome or more positive return on your investment while your project is progressing. However, as a contractor I may have suggested improving the look and design of the porch during the initial design stage. Just as an instructional designer needs to carefully design a program and take all variations into consideration, a contractor should do the same when designing a renovation.
References:
Lynch, M. M., & Roecker, J. (2007). Project managing e-learning: A handbook for successful design, delivery, and management. London: Routledge. Copyright by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Reprinted by permission of Taylor & Francis Group, LLC via the Copyright Clearance Center. Chapter 5, “Controlling the Project” (pp. 94–108)
Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Communicating Effectively
President and CEO of National Semiconductor Corp.
Messages can be delivered using various forms of communication - formal, informal, written, and verbal. However, the same message can be delivered using different modalities, but generate different interpretations.
For this assignment I had to receive the same message using three different modalities: Email, Voicemail, and Person-to-Person. The message was an informal message. Formal communications "are pre-planned and conducted in a standard format in accordance with an established schedule." Informal communications "occur as people think of information they want to share" (Portney, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, & Kramer, 2008, p. 357). However, just because an informal method was chosen, in today's world of technology I would not consider an informal message unimportant.
Interpretation of the Message:
Email – I had to read the message twice to understand what was being said. I felt the message was run-on sentences; thoughts being thrown onto paper.
Voicemail – The voicemail message was clearer and I had a better understanding of what was needed. The message was friendly and conveyed the feeling that there was a working relationship.
Person-to-Person – I didn't find the message to be any different than the voicemail message. However, the person-to-person message was very scripted and impersonal.
Factors that influenced my perception:
Email – Email can be considered an informal method of communication, but there must still be some structure to the message. Written communications should 1)Begin with a clear purpose, 2) State the situation, 3) include possible solutions, 4) Indicate if a sign-off is required, 5) Specify the form that the response is required to take, 6) Keep the tone of all communications business friendly and respectful. (Stolovitch) In this particular message, not all of these components were relevant, but the purpose, situation, and solution should have been communicated in a more structured manner.
Voicemail – The voicemail seemed more casual and was easier to understand. I do not think the messenger was clear in any of her messages exactly what data she needed. But the message did not seem as fragmented.
Face-to-Face – As in the voicemail, the message appeared clearer. However, the messenger appeared scripted and "unfriendly" making it difficult to stay focused on what she was saying.
Most effective form of communication:
The voicemail worked best for me. I am an auditory learner and maybe that contributed to this method being most effective. The voicemail was casual and clear making it "real" and conveyed a working relationship and a feeling that the messenger knew how to speak so that I would understand.
Effectively communicating with project team members:
"The ability to communicate well, both orally and written, is a critical skill for project managers" (Portney, et al, 2008, p. 357) Written communications should beprofessional, clear and concise. Sending emails(or any written communication) that require multiple readings to understand will either create frustration and lack of understanding for the recipient or it will quickly end up in the "wastebasket." Verbal communications should be professional, but friendly and not intimidating and impersonal. You want to keep the recipient engaged in what you are saying. Regardless of the modality you choose, the one thing that must always be conveyed (and wasn't in any of the examples) is that if there is any question they should contact you and how you can be reached. Letting the recipient know that you are available to clarify and help resolve the issue, tells them the issue is important to you. Just as we all learn differently, we all communicate and interpret communications differently. When dealing with team members on an indivdiual basis,use their preferred communication style. If you are communicating with the group, use a formal style of written communication or consider a face-to-face meeting.
References:
Portney, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Stolovitch, D. (n.d.). Communicating with Stakeholders.
http://www.leadershipnow.com/communicationquotes.html
Thursday, July 7, 2011
A Project Post-Mortem
“Project management is the process of guiding a project from its beginning through its performance to its closure” (Portney, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, & Kramer, 2008, p. 3). This project did not have a Project Manager (PM) nor did it have any of the formal processes of the project management process. While I am happy that the implementation was successful, I now realize how important it would have been to either have a PM or some formal systematic approach to the process.
At the end of a project, it is important to do a project review and look at what was learned from the project and what could be done better in the future. This process is referred to as post-project reviews or “post mortems” (Greer, 2010, p. 42). Below is my post-mortem of the LMS project.
This project did have a defined outcome, however, there was no schedule or allocated resources; there was no formal process, plan or team. Michael Greer suggests that upon completion of a project you do an evaluation from an overall general perspective and the “Five Phase-Specific Questions” perspective (Greer, 2010, pp. 42, 43).
Overall Perspective of the Project
The implementation of this project was a success, however, I think it could have been completed in a much shorter timeframe had more stakeholders taken an active role in the project. It took approximately 1.5 years (out of a 3 year contract) to implement; a loss of 1.5 years on the contract. Key stakeholders who should have been actively involved in the entire process included IT personnel, Subject Matters Experts (SMEs), Human Resources and department managers. The most difficult and time consuming part of this process was mapping staff to the appropriate learning groups without management input. While the system is functioning, mapping is still not accurate and needs to be reworked to use the system more efficiently.
Greer’s five phases to assess include: 1) Determine Need and Feasibility; 2) Create Project Plan; 3) Create Specifications for Deliverables; 4) Create Deliverables; and 5) Test and Implement Deliverables. None of these phases were planned in any way. A feasibility study should have been done to determine that the purchase and implementation of an LMS was beneficial and cost-effective. Once it was determined that the project would be beneficial to the organization, a project plan should have been developed; key stakeholders should have been recruited and assigned roles; and a formal PM process should have been followed. Had a formal process been followed the system could have been implemented within 6 months vs. 1.5 years, learning groups would have been mapped correctly from the beginning, and technology requirements for learning modules (i.e. Flash, Adobe reader, etc.) would have been identified and installed on all computers prior to assignment of a module.
What was Learned
Always have a plan! Regardless of the size of the project, you need to follow a systematic approach and carefully plan the project. Any and all future endeavors I am involved in, I will follow Greer’s “10 Steps to Project Success” (p. 45) or some form thereof. Use of Statements of Work, Work Breakdown Structure, diagrams, and schedules help to keep the project organized, maintain communication amongst stakeholders, and completion timelines on track. This project could have been a complete failure, but fortunately it wasn’t. We now have a committee that includes all the previously identified stakeholders who meet quarterly to help improve the use of the system and future upgrades.
References:
Greer, M. (2010). The project management minimalist: Just enough PM to rock your projects. Baltimore: Laureate Education, Inc.
Portney, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sunday, June 26, 2011
Reflection - Distant Learning’s Future and the Impact of the Instructional Designer
What will perceptions of distance learning be in the future?
Distance learning will continue to grow as a viable option for education. However, there are misconceptions about the quality of distance learning and the integrity of the distant learner. Some perceive distant learning to be easier than traditional face-to-face classes and that it is easier to cheat in distance learning.
As distant learning becomes more integrated in elementary and high schools, we will see the benefits it has to offer and there will be a shift in attitude toward distant learning. Anyone who has engaged in a distant learning class knows that the quality of the courses, if from an accredited institution, is just as good (maybe even better) than face-to-face instruction. Technology will continue to advance and as George Siemens stated: “there will be more experiences communicating online; new tools; and a growing sense of comfort. There will be global contributions and an increase in games and simulations.” With advancements in computer and internet-based technologies, distance learning will support student-centered instruction which promotes “active learning, collaboration, mastery of course material and student control over the learning process” (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, Zvackek; pgs. 231 & 232).
How can the instructional designer be a proponent for improving societal perceptions of distance learning?
In the article Academic Fidelity and Integrity as Attributes of University Online Degree Program Offerings it states “By academic integrity we mean how consistent is the online degree program with its campus based counterpart and institutional and professional standards” (Gambescia and Paolucci, para. 4). I believe as an instructional designer this is one of the most important factors we must remember so that all educational programs, whether they are online or in the classroom, maintain the same qualitative standard. Courses must be effectively designed and implemented so that educators and students can demonstrate that the distant learner has met the same academic rigor of a face-to-face course.
How can the instructional designer be a positive force for continuous improvement in the field of distance education?
As an instructional designer I think it is important that we focus on designing quality education that incorporates appropriate strategies that is conducive to the learner audience. For example, in the healthcare industry the use of simulation and problem-based learning should be considered. Distance learning should be collaborative and student-centered and the instructional designer should understand the learner audience demographics to promote a positive learning experience. Instructional designers should select and use appropriate learning tools and strategies (discussion boards, journals, blogs, wikis, video, audio, simulation, games, etc.) that will maintain learner attention. A systematic approach by the instructional designer, such as ADDIE, should be followed to determine the most effective means of delivering the course (online, face-to-face, hybrid). “Focus on knowledge construction, not reproduction…Present authentic tasks…[that] provide real world case-based learning environments,…Foster reflective practice, and enable context and content dependent knowledge construction,…Support collaborative construction of knowledge through social negotiation, not competition among learners for recognition” (Rovai, 2004).
References:
Gambescia, S., & Paolucci, R. (2009). Academic fidelity and integrity as attributes of university online degree program offerings. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(1). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring121/gambescia121.html
Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2009). Distance Education in the Digital Age: Common Misconceptions and Challenging Tasks. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 105-122. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Rovai, A. P. (2004). A Constructivist Approach to Online College Learning. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 79-93. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Siemens, George. The future of distance education video.
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2009). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (4th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.